with the title ‘Millennial Oscillations of Solar Irradiance and Magnetic Field in 600–2600’,
Read Here: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/75534
A site to report about my research in solar activity and energetic particles
with the title ‘Millennial Oscillations of Solar Irradiance and Magnetic Field in 600–2600’,
Read Here: https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/75534
The SR Editor Mr. R. Marszalek retracted our paper without stating the real reason – the Editor and AGW people object the suggestion of the paper that the Sun-Earth distance changes periodically over a long period of time, 2100-2200 years. The AGW people claim that the S-E distance is the same at all times.
We placed our protest in the comments below the retracted paper and the Editor’s note, just scroll down to read our comments.
Now you can find our paper here and on the archive 2002.06550 until we publish it again.
The retraction confirms that our paper was very innovative indeed if the AGW people are so afraid of us telling to other people the truth about solar inertial motion and its effect on the Earth and other planets.
While the current Hallstatt’s cycle of 2100-2200 years, which started during Maunder Minimum and continues now until 2700. This means that the Sun currently moves towards the Earth until 2700. This, in turn, will result in extra-heating by the Sun of Earth and other planets that can account for the observed increase of terrestrial and other planets temperatures. See for details the erratum paper explaining the details.
The authors’ objections to the paper retraction were not published on the SR site, in spite, we have sent them these documents. So the author documents can be found here read it here
The links to the published archive paper and to the erratum paper calculating the solar irradiance and terrestrial temperature can explain to everyone what they are afraid of.
This retraction reminds us of the medieval ages because we believe, the SR Editor did the retraction on not so well explained reason because they try to cover up the important solar forcing input caused by SIM not considered by any temperature models.
This suggestion is confirmed by the publication in New Scientist where the only people who commented on this retraction were the AGW supporters G. Schmidt (NASA) and K.Rice (Edinburg University) read it here
Read the article HERE
https://clintel.nl/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/ecd-press-briefing.pdf