5 Replies to “The sun shows signs of hibernation in its modern grand solar minimum February-April 2026”
Shocked to see how quickly my comments were taken down and my access to solar gsm cut off
Guess you don’t think you need me
Wish you well anyway and my parting message is
Dissertation: The Heliospheric Failure and the Suppression of Cosmogenic Data
This dissertation examines the intersection of heliophysics, material science, and atmospheric chemistry during the transition into Solar Cycle 25. It argues that a significant decline in solar polar field strength has led to a fundamental failure of the heliospheric shield, allowing an unprecedented flux of Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) to penetrate the inner solar system. This surge is the primary driver of recent orbital anomalies, spacecraft material failure, and radical shifts in atmospheric radiocarbon concentrations. Furthermore, it posits that institutional gatekeepers, specifically the University of Paris and associated neutron monitoring bodies, have systematically manipulated barometric and neutron count data to preserve the prevailing carbon-centric climate narrative and protect the aerospace industry from negligence litigation.
I. The Mechanism of Heliospheric Collapse
The heliosphere,
Earth’s primary defense against deep-space radiation, is generated by the Sun’s polar magnetic fields. Since the onset of Solar Cycle 25, these polar fields have exhibited a marked failure to rebuild a coherent dipole structure. This “magnetic stuttering” has thinned the heliospheric bubble, allowing high-energy heavy ions to reach the inner planets. Unlike solar protons, these relativistic particles possess sufficient rigidity to bypass standard magnetic cut-offs, even at low latitudes. The primary evidence for this collapse is the recent Ground Level Enhancement 77 (GLE77), which exhibited a “hard” energy component that contradicts standard solar acceleration models.
II. Atmospheric Expansion and the Orbital Wall
The unchecked GCR flux induces massive ionization in the upper atmosphere. This energy deposition causes the thermosphere to “puff up” or expand.
• Design Thrust Failure:
Current aerospace engineering models—including those used for the Artemis heat shield and Blue Origin’s New Glenn second stage—rely on outdated “steady-state” atmospheric density assumptions.
• The LEO Crisis:
The recent failure of Amazon’s Project Kuiper orbital insertion is not a result of mechanical misfires, but a failure to account for increased drag. The atmosphere at 95 miles is now significantly denser than models predicted, making the designed thrust of modern rockets inadequate for achieving stable orbits.
•
III. Piezoelectric Failure and Dielectric Charging
Spacecraft materials, particularly the Avcoat ablator used in the Orion capsule, are susceptible to “deep dielectric charging” during prolonged exposure to GCRs.
• The Precharged Shield:
As GCRs penetrate the non-conductive resin of the shield, they deposit a latent electrical charge. Upon re-entry, the formation of a conductive plasma sheath triggers a dielectric breakdown—an internal lightning strike.
• The Spalling Phenomenon:
This electrical discharge, rather than simple “trapped gas,” causes the characteristic potholing or “chunking” seen on the Artemis I shield. NASA’s shift to a direct, steeper entry for Artemis II was an attempt to discharge this energy faster, though the “trapped gas” narrative remains the official cover to avoid admitting the deep-space environment is now physically incompatible with current polymer tech.
•
IV. The Carbon-14 Anomaly and “Future Dating”
The most significant terrestrial impact of the GCR surge is the “re-salting” of the atmosphere with fresh Carbon-14 (C14). GCR-induced neutron spallation turns Nitrogen-14 into C14 at rates exceeding the legacy “bomb spike” of the 1960s.
• Inversion of Chronology:
Because modern samples contain higher concentrations of C14 than pre-2020 baselines, radiocarbon dating software increasingly returns “future ages.”
• Institutional Gatekeeping:
The University of Paris and the NMDB maintain control over the global neutron count models. By falsifying atmospheric pressure data—artificially inflating barometric readings—they can “correct” neutron counts downward, hiding the surge. This maintains the facade that CO2 remains the sole driver of atmospheric change, protecting the C12 -dominated climate alarmist industry from the reality of cosmogenic c14 volatility •
V. Biological Sentinels and Undisclosed Data
The Southern Ocean acts as a ground-level sensor for these hard GCR detections.
• The Krill Kill: The observed die-offs are due to the vulnerability of “open vasculature” marine life to acute endothelial damage caused by secondary radiation showers.
• Radioactive Scampi:
The presence of Beryllium-10 in crustacean exoskeletons—markers of atmospheric spallation—proves the radiation is coming from the heliospheric failure, not terrestrial pollution.
• The CERN Vault:
While surface monitors are “pressure-corrected” to show stability, the underground “off-beam” logs at CERN provide the true, unfiltered count of the cosmic flux. These logs remain inaccessible to the public to prevent a global reassessment of aviation safety and radiation health standards.
Conclusion
The data suggests that Solar Cycle 25 has ushered in a new era of cosmic environmental risk that current aerospace and climate models are unwilling to acknowledge. The preservation of the CO2 narrative and the avoidance of massive court cases involving orbital and health failures have necessitated a systematic suppression of hard neutron data and cosmogenic isotope surges. Until the “Paris models” are challenged by the raw CERN and polar bare-monitor streams, the industry will continue to operate under a false baseline of atmospheric and heliospheric stability.
Thank you for the comment. The sun has entered a grand solar minimum caused by the two dynamo wave interference. This causes a reduction of solar background magnetic field and thus reduction of solar activity https://www.nature.com/articles/srep15689.
Thank you so much for allowing me to post on your website
LinkedIn has suspended my account so I can’t even see what I previously commented on your SOLAR GSM site (via them) or see any comments on those particular posts
Somehow I got flagged for being a malicious agent by posting prohibited content?
Since you first made me aware of the Maunder GSM I have been astounded at the number of parallels between what was observed then and what we are witnessing now
Examining ships logs from that period and particularly the Dutch East India company is illuminating
Key Ship Logs & Voyages from that period recorded “Stagnant” or “Dead” Waters red auroras and green ice
During the core of the Maunder Minimum, mariners from the Dutch East India Company (VOC) and British East India Company recorded high-frequency encounters with abnormal water conditions in the North Atlantic and Pacific.
• The Dutch VOC Logbooks (1680–1695):
Extensive archives from VOC ships (e.g., the Batavia or Gouden Buys) contain entries describing “thickened” surface waters and “putrid” smells, particularly in the mid-Atlantic and the Bay of Bengal. These accounts often coincide with periods of “Red Vapors”(low-latitude auroras), which were especially noted in 1683 and 1692.
• The English:
While Cook’s famous voyage was later, earlier journals from the 1690s frequently mention “stagnant calms” where the water lost its clarity and took on a “viscous” quality. In the context of increased GCR spallation, this was likely a result of radiation damage to krill vasculature and subsequent massive buildup of ungrazed phytoplankton that had begun to rot due to the collapse of krill-like grazers.
• Spanish Galleon Records (Pacific):
Accounts of the Manila Galleon trade (e.g., records by naturalists like G.F. de Oviedoor mention “lifeless stretches” of the Pacific where marine life—normally abundant—appeared to have vanished during the late 17th century.
Now similar to the time of the previous GSM these red only auroras and dead putrid ocean phenomena are being observed again by modern technology
2025 and 2026, satellite data and oceanographic monitoring from NASA and ESA have detected anomalies that appear to align with a GCR instigated global systemic collapse.
While these events are being currently identified as “unusual productivity” or “climate shifts,” the visual evidence from space shows massive un-grazed blooms the expansion of hypoxic dead zones in precisely the areas where GCR spallation products are most likely to concentrate.
1. 2026 Satellite Evidence:
The “Un-grazed” Blooms
NASA’s PACE (Plankton, Aerosol, Cloud, Ecosystem) satellite (https://science.nasa.gov/earth/new-nasa-views-of-earth-from-space/), launched to monitor ocean color, has detected massive phytoplankton plumes in the Southern Ocean that are “too big and too clearly spreading” to be normal seasonal variations.
While scientists blame “iron fertilization” from the melting ice, I suggest these are blooms that have lost their grazers. These algae are thriving because the krill—suffering from radiation damage due to their open vasculature—are no longer there to eat them.
• Green-Tinted Ice (March 2026):
ESA’s Copernicus Sentinel-3 satellites (https://www.instagram.com/p/DVoWYN0jBda/) spotted extraordinary scenes of ice tinted green by thriving phytoplankton in the Cooperation Sea and Ross Sea. This indicates a highly fertile surface layer that lacks the biological “lawnmowers” needed to keep it in check.
2. 2025–2026 Dead Zone Hotspots
As these unchecked blooms die and sink, they create the “anaerobic dead zones”
Satellite monitoring is identifying “areas of concern” that are at high risk of turning into these permanent dead zones.
• South Australian “Karenia” Bloom (2025–2026):
A massive bloom of Kareniaalgae formed in March 2025 (https://www.miragenews.com/new-nasa-views-of-earth-from-pace-1659451/) and was tracked for months by PACE. It produced neurotoxins that killed marine life across a massive region—exactly the kind of “toxic blanket” that forms when the grazing pressure of krill and scampi is removed.
• Deep Water
“Darkwaves” (2025–2026):
Researchers have proposed a new framework called Marine Darkwaves (https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-025-03023-4) to describe sudden, intense reductions in underwater light. These “darkwaves” often correspond to deep-water basin hypoxia where there is no land-based runoff, suggestive of an internal systemic collapse.
National Geographic reports (https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/dead-zone/) that “areas of concern” are exhibiting negative changes in the benthic community, which are the precursor to total dead zones. These are the habitats where scampi are absorbing radionuclides during shell formation in the benthic sediment
Historical Tipping Points:
2020–2026
The NASA PACE data from April 2026 shows that we are currently seeing “surges of microscopic life” that match the intensity of the radionuclide spikes known to have occurred and recorded in tree rings during the Maunder Minimum. The authorities are calling it a “new low-ice era,” but they are essentially describing the expected global effects of the 2020 GCR surge (the new mini ice age)
I could also contribute several pages about other striking parallels in ecological activity like recent locust swarms in Morocco seemingly repeating Transylvanian locust plagues during the Maunder minimum and as to how the severe weather gives rise to seratonin triggers in the hoppers causing larger wing growth and gregarious swarming behaviour
Thanks for this valuable information about the sign of gsm. I did not have time to explore them all but these are very striking. Let me investigate it and see how it can be popularised.
I had been pondering the recent widespread radioactive shrimp detections
Be10 is a relatively weak beta emitter and the problem was initially identified by scanning ship containers at various ports around the world by gamma ray emissions testing
The elephant in the room has emerged as Be7 which is created in the atmosphere by GCRs at a ratio of 1.6/ 1.0 to Be10
Be7 is a massive gamma ray source being (at equal mass or atom count) approximately 9.5 million times more radioactive than is Be10
Half-life of Be7 is counted in days
Because Cs137 was determined to be the cause in Indonesia I had a look at the testing methods and radioactive isotope signatures involved
It is apparent that the Cs137 detection is likely a type 1 error (false positive)
Generally radiological testing is limited to a few specific isotopes indicative of the big three nuclear testing byproducts (Cs, Co, Ir) with the aim of such testing being to establish a culprit
It seems that there has been a misidentification of cosmogenic Beryllium-7 and Beryllium-10 as the anthropogenic fission product Cesium-137
By analyzing spectral overlaps in both gamma and beta emissions, it seems to me that surges in cosmic ray flux—such as those observed during solar minima—can create a “radiological phantom” that mimics industrial contamination in low-to-mid-resolution detection environments.
In the field, rapid screening for Cs137 relies on Sodium Iodide (NaI) scintillation detectors. These devices possess a “full width at half maximum” (FWHM) resolution that often exceeds 7%.
Be7 emits a gamma photon at 477.6 keV.
Concurrently, the primary emission of Cs137 (662 keV) creates a Compton Edge at exactly 477 keV.
In the absence of a clear 662 keV photopeak (due to shielding or low source activity), a detector “seeing” a surge at 477 keV identifies the signature of scattered Cesium which can be attributed to a nearby contamination
During a solar minimum the flux of Be7 increases significantly and attaches to biological material. A field technician encountering this “bright” 477 keV peak from contaminated shrimp would naturally conclude they are in the presence of a heavily shielded or distant C137 source.
When samples are brought to a laboratory for confirmation, beta counting is employed to determine the specific activity. This is where the secondary misidentification occurs.
There is a spectral proximity
Whereas C137 has a maximum Beta signature of 512 keV. Be10 is 556 keV.
Unlike gamma spectroscopy, beta spectroscopy produces a broad, featureless “hump.” The difference between a 512 keV endpoint and a 556 keV endpoint is only 8%.
In an industrial context (like the “Peters Metals” scenario in Java) labs are only looking for Cs, Co, and Ir). If a beta-spectrometer shows a curve terminating in the 500–600 keV range, it is statistically attributed to C137 The lab “confirms” the field report, unaware that they are measuring cosmogenic background Be10 that has accumulated in the material of a the test sample
In the Indonesian detection incident, regulators attributed the beta-energy spikes exclusively to “Cs” despite the absence of the 661.7 keV endpoint
It is noteworthy that concurrent testing by Indonesian laboratories were able to find no trace of the supposed Cs contamination
This misinterpretation was likely a calculated move to localise a global event, creating a legal “villain” to explain away a broader environmental anomaly.
The “Peters Metals” event was not an isolated failure but part of a worldwide phenomenon. Similar high-energy radioactivity spikes were detected simultaneously in Australia, Europe, and Asia.
While Indonesia had a “suspect” (PT Peter Metal Technology), the other worldwide detections remained without an identified industrial source. This lack of suspects suggests the origin was not terrestrial.
By naming a culprit in only one location while leaving the others as “unresolved,” authorities successfully prevented the public from connecting the dots. Admitting that identical spikes occurred globally without a local source would prove the actual cause:
Beryllium-10 and Beryllium 7 produced by atmospheric spallation of galactic cosmic rays
Beryllium isotopes have been deliberately excluded from the final reports because their cosmic origin makes it “unactionable.” By ignoring the Be-10 and Be7 spikes detected in the shrimp —which were the true drivers of the global radiation surge—the powers that be maintain a manageable, albeit false, regulatory landscape.
The branding of the Indonesian event as “Cesium” provided a strategic pivot point for international trade and geopolitics
Since the US FDA issued multiple recalls of Indonesian shrimp in late 2025 after identifying Cesium-137, and attributing the blame to a polluted industrial zone near Jakarta a major shift has occurred with less cooperation with China and new movement towards the USA
On Feb. 19, 2026, the U.S. and Indonesia signed a landmark Reciprocal Trade Agreement that aims to reorder economic relations.
On April 13, 2026, they announced a Major Defence Cooperation Partnership (MDCP)
By isolating the Jakarta industrial park case and ignoring the other numerous global detections, the current CO2 alarmist scientific community along with the aviation and space industries avoid the terrifying admission that GCR spallation has reached a level that is triggering industrial alarms worldwide.
The 2025–2026 radiological crisis currently destroying the oceanic protein source is a singular, global atmospheric event involving increased GCR spallation products
The “Peters Metals” narrative was a construct—a successful attempt to rebrand a cosmic surge as a man-made accident. The spectral peaks for Be and Cs would appear to have been misinterpreted by design; naming a culprit in Java provided the necessary cover to ignore a nameless, worldwide increase in cosmic radiation and facilitate a major change in geopolitical arrangements
Shocked to see how quickly my comments were taken down and my access to solar gsm cut off
Guess you don’t think you need me
Wish you well anyway and my parting message is
Dissertation: The Heliospheric Failure and the Suppression of Cosmogenic Data
This dissertation examines the intersection of heliophysics, material science, and atmospheric chemistry during the transition into Solar Cycle 25. It argues that a significant decline in solar polar field strength has led to a fundamental failure of the heliospheric shield, allowing an unprecedented flux of Galactic Cosmic Rays (GCRs) to penetrate the inner solar system. This surge is the primary driver of recent orbital anomalies, spacecraft material failure, and radical shifts in atmospheric radiocarbon concentrations. Furthermore, it posits that institutional gatekeepers, specifically the University of Paris and associated neutron monitoring bodies, have systematically manipulated barometric and neutron count data to preserve the prevailing carbon-centric climate narrative and protect the aerospace industry from negligence litigation.
I. The Mechanism of Heliospheric Collapse
The heliosphere,
Earth’s primary defense against deep-space radiation, is generated by the Sun’s polar magnetic fields. Since the onset of Solar Cycle 25, these polar fields have exhibited a marked failure to rebuild a coherent dipole structure. This “magnetic stuttering” has thinned the heliospheric bubble, allowing high-energy heavy ions to reach the inner planets. Unlike solar protons, these relativistic particles possess sufficient rigidity to bypass standard magnetic cut-offs, even at low latitudes. The primary evidence for this collapse is the recent Ground Level Enhancement 77 (GLE77), which exhibited a “hard” energy component that contradicts standard solar acceleration models.
II. Atmospheric Expansion and the Orbital Wall
The unchecked GCR flux induces massive ionization in the upper atmosphere. This energy deposition causes the thermosphere to “puff up” or expand.
• Design Thrust Failure:
Current aerospace engineering models—including those used for the Artemis heat shield and Blue Origin’s New Glenn second stage—rely on outdated “steady-state” atmospheric density assumptions.
• The LEO Crisis:
The recent failure of Amazon’s Project Kuiper orbital insertion is not a result of mechanical misfires, but a failure to account for increased drag. The atmosphere at 95 miles is now significantly denser than models predicted, making the designed thrust of modern rockets inadequate for achieving stable orbits.
•
III. Piezoelectric Failure and Dielectric Charging
Spacecraft materials, particularly the Avcoat ablator used in the Orion capsule, are susceptible to “deep dielectric charging” during prolonged exposure to GCRs.
• The Precharged Shield:
As GCRs penetrate the non-conductive resin of the shield, they deposit a latent electrical charge. Upon re-entry, the formation of a conductive plasma sheath triggers a dielectric breakdown—an internal lightning strike.
• The Spalling Phenomenon:
This electrical discharge, rather than simple “trapped gas,” causes the characteristic potholing or “chunking” seen on the Artemis I shield. NASA’s shift to a direct, steeper entry for Artemis II was an attempt to discharge this energy faster, though the “trapped gas” narrative remains the official cover to avoid admitting the deep-space environment is now physically incompatible with current polymer tech.
•
IV. The Carbon-14 Anomaly and “Future Dating”
The most significant terrestrial impact of the GCR surge is the “re-salting” of the atmosphere with fresh Carbon-14 (C14). GCR-induced neutron spallation turns Nitrogen-14 into C14 at rates exceeding the legacy “bomb spike” of the 1960s.
• Inversion of Chronology:
Because modern samples contain higher concentrations of C14 than pre-2020 baselines, radiocarbon dating software increasingly returns “future ages.”
• Institutional Gatekeeping:
The University of Paris and the NMDB maintain control over the global neutron count models. By falsifying atmospheric pressure data—artificially inflating barometric readings—they can “correct” neutron counts downward, hiding the surge. This maintains the facade that CO2 remains the sole driver of atmospheric change, protecting the C12 -dominated climate alarmist industry from the reality of cosmogenic c14 volatility •
V. Biological Sentinels and Undisclosed Data
The Southern Ocean acts as a ground-level sensor for these hard GCR detections.
• The Krill Kill: The observed die-offs are due to the vulnerability of “open vasculature” marine life to acute endothelial damage caused by secondary radiation showers.
• Radioactive Scampi:
The presence of Beryllium-10 in crustacean exoskeletons—markers of atmospheric spallation—proves the radiation is coming from the heliospheric failure, not terrestrial pollution.
• The CERN Vault:
While surface monitors are “pressure-corrected” to show stability, the underground “off-beam” logs at CERN provide the true, unfiltered count of the cosmic flux. These logs remain inaccessible to the public to prevent a global reassessment of aviation safety and radiation health standards.
Conclusion
The data suggests that Solar Cycle 25 has ushered in a new era of cosmic environmental risk that current aerospace and climate models are unwilling to acknowledge. The preservation of the CO2 narrative and the avoidance of massive court cases involving orbital and health failures have necessitated a systematic suppression of hard neutron data and cosmogenic isotope surges. Until the “Paris models” are challenged by the raw CERN and polar bare-monitor streams, the industry will continue to operate under a false baseline of atmospheric and heliospheric stability.
Thank you for the comment. The sun has entered a grand solar minimum caused by the two dynamo wave interference. This causes a reduction of solar background magnetic field and thus reduction of solar activity https://www.nature.com/articles/srep15689.
Dear Valentina
Thank you so much for allowing me to post on your website
LinkedIn has suspended my account so I can’t even see what I previously commented on your SOLAR GSM site (via them) or see any comments on those particular posts
Somehow I got flagged for being a malicious agent by posting prohibited content?
Since you first made me aware of the Maunder GSM I have been astounded at the number of parallels between what was observed then and what we are witnessing now
Examining ships logs from that period and particularly the Dutch East India company is illuminating
Key Ship Logs & Voyages from that period recorded “Stagnant” or “Dead” Waters red auroras and green ice
During the core of the Maunder Minimum, mariners from the Dutch East India Company (VOC) and British East India Company recorded high-frequency encounters with abnormal water conditions in the North Atlantic and Pacific.
• The Dutch VOC Logbooks (1680–1695):
Extensive archives from VOC ships (e.g., the Batavia or Gouden Buys) contain entries describing “thickened” surface waters and “putrid” smells, particularly in the mid-Atlantic and the Bay of Bengal. These accounts often coincide with periods of “Red Vapors”(low-latitude auroras), which were especially noted in 1683 and 1692.
• The English:
While Cook’s famous voyage was later, earlier journals from the 1690s frequently mention “stagnant calms” where the water lost its clarity and took on a “viscous” quality. In the context of increased GCR spallation, this was likely a result of radiation damage to krill vasculature and subsequent massive buildup of ungrazed phytoplankton that had begun to rot due to the collapse of krill-like grazers.
• Spanish Galleon Records (Pacific):
Accounts of the Manila Galleon trade (e.g., records by naturalists like G.F. de Oviedoor mention “lifeless stretches” of the Pacific where marine life—normally abundant—appeared to have vanished during the late 17th century.
Now similar to the time of the previous GSM these red only auroras and dead putrid ocean phenomena are being observed again by modern technology
2025 and 2026, satellite data and oceanographic monitoring from NASA and ESA have detected anomalies that appear to align with a GCR instigated global systemic collapse.
While these events are being currently identified as “unusual productivity” or “climate shifts,” the visual evidence from space shows massive un-grazed blooms the expansion of hypoxic dead zones in precisely the areas where GCR spallation products are most likely to concentrate.
1. 2026 Satellite Evidence:
The “Un-grazed” Blooms
NASA’s PACE (Plankton, Aerosol, Cloud, Ecosystem) satellite (https://science.nasa.gov/earth/new-nasa-views-of-earth-from-space/), launched to monitor ocean color, has detected massive phytoplankton plumes in the Southern Ocean that are “too big and too clearly spreading” to be normal seasonal variations.
• The “Megaberg” A-23A Bloom (March 2026):
As the giant iceberg A-23A broke apart, PACE detected massive chlorophyll-a plumes (https://www.earth.com/news/melting-antarctic-iceberg-a-23a-triggers-huge-phytoplankton-bloom/) swirling around its fragments.
• The Spallation Connection:
While scientists blame “iron fertilization” from the melting ice, I suggest these are blooms that have lost their grazers. These algae are thriving because the krill—suffering from radiation damage due to their open vasculature—are no longer there to eat them.
• Green-Tinted Ice (March 2026):
ESA’s Copernicus Sentinel-3 satellites (https://www.instagram.com/p/DVoWYN0jBda/) spotted extraordinary scenes of ice tinted green by thriving phytoplankton in the Cooperation Sea and Ross Sea. This indicates a highly fertile surface layer that lacks the biological “lawnmowers” needed to keep it in check.
2. 2025–2026 Dead Zone Hotspots
As these unchecked blooms die and sink, they create the “anaerobic dead zones”
Satellite monitoring is identifying “areas of concern” that are at high risk of turning into these permanent dead zones.
• South Australian “Karenia” Bloom (2025–2026):
A massive bloom of Kareniaalgae formed in March 2025 (https://www.miragenews.com/new-nasa-views-of-earth-from-pace-1659451/) and was tracked for months by PACE. It produced neurotoxins that killed marine life across a massive region—exactly the kind of “toxic blanket” that forms when the grazing pressure of krill and scampi is removed.
• Deep Water
“Darkwaves” (2025–2026):
Researchers have proposed a new framework called Marine Darkwaves (https://www.nature.com/articles/s43247-025-03023-4) to describe sudden, intense reductions in underwater light. These “darkwaves” often correspond to deep-water basin hypoxia where there is no land-based runoff, suggestive of an internal systemic collapse.
• Expansion of Open-Ocean Dead Zones:
Data shared at the 2025 Oceans Conference (https://news.mongabay.com/2025/06/when-our-oceans-cant-breathe-a-sea-change-is-needed-commentary/) confirms that dead zones in the open ocean have grown by 4.5 million square kilometres—an area the size of the European Union.
3. The “Unexplained” Benthic Mortality
While satellites watch the surface, coastal records continue to report mass mortality in benthic communities that authorities cannot explain.
• Gulf of Mexico Bottom-Dwelling Deaths (July 2025):
The LUMCON/NOAA survey (https://coastalscience.noaa.gov/news/below-average-summer-2025-dead-zone-measured-in-gulf/)measured over 2.8 million acres of habitat as “unavailable” to bottom-dwelling species due to hypoxia.
• Benthic Community “Negatives”:
National Geographic reports (https://education.nationalgeographic.org/resource/dead-zone/) that “areas of concern” are exhibiting negative changes in the benthic community, which are the precursor to total dead zones. These are the habitats where scampi are absorbing radionuclides during shell formation in the benthic sediment
Historical Tipping Points:
2020–2026
The NASA PACE data from April 2026 shows that we are currently seeing “surges of microscopic life” that match the intensity of the radionuclide spikes known to have occurred and recorded in tree rings during the Maunder Minimum. The authorities are calling it a “new low-ice era,” but they are essentially describing the expected global effects of the 2020 GCR surge (the new mini ice age)
I could also contribute several pages about other striking parallels in ecological activity like recent locust swarms in Morocco seemingly repeating Transylvanian locust plagues during the Maunder minimum and as to how the severe weather gives rise to seratonin triggers in the hoppers causing larger wing growth and gregarious swarming behaviour
Perhaps another time
Best regards
Dear Lance,
Thanks for this valuable information about the sign of gsm. I did not have time to explore them all but these are very striking. Let me investigate it and see how it can be popularised.
Keep your good work
Valentina
Dear Valentina
I had been pondering the recent widespread radioactive shrimp detections
Be10 is a relatively weak beta emitter and the problem was initially identified by scanning ship containers at various ports around the world by gamma ray emissions testing
The elephant in the room has emerged as Be7 which is created in the atmosphere by GCRs at a ratio of 1.6/ 1.0 to Be10
Be7 is a massive gamma ray source being (at equal mass or atom count) approximately 9.5 million times more radioactive than is Be10
Half-life of Be7 is counted in days
Because Cs137 was determined to be the cause in Indonesia I had a look at the testing methods and radioactive isotope signatures involved
It is apparent that the Cs137 detection is likely a type 1 error (false positive)
Generally radiological testing is limited to a few specific isotopes indicative of the big three nuclear testing byproducts (Cs, Co, Ir) with the aim of such testing being to establish a culprit
It seems that there has been a misidentification of cosmogenic Beryllium-7 and Beryllium-10 as the anthropogenic fission product Cesium-137
By analyzing spectral overlaps in both gamma and beta emissions, it seems to me that surges in cosmic ray flux—such as those observed during solar minima—can create a “radiological phantom” that mimics industrial contamination in low-to-mid-resolution detection environments.
In the field, rapid screening for Cs137 relies on Sodium Iodide (NaI) scintillation detectors. These devices possess a “full width at half maximum” (FWHM) resolution that often exceeds 7%.
Be7 emits a gamma photon at 477.6 keV.
Concurrently, the primary emission of Cs137 (662 keV) creates a Compton Edge at exactly 477 keV.
In the absence of a clear 662 keV photopeak (due to shielding or low source activity), a detector “seeing” a surge at 477 keV identifies the signature of scattered Cesium which can be attributed to a nearby contamination
During a solar minimum the flux of Be7 increases significantly and attaches to biological material. A field technician encountering this “bright” 477 keV peak from contaminated shrimp would naturally conclude they are in the presence of a heavily shielded or distant C137 source.
When samples are brought to a laboratory for confirmation, beta counting is employed to determine the specific activity. This is where the secondary misidentification occurs.
There is a spectral proximity
Whereas C137 has a maximum Beta signature of 512 keV. Be10 is 556 keV.
Unlike gamma spectroscopy, beta spectroscopy produces a broad, featureless “hump.” The difference between a 512 keV endpoint and a 556 keV endpoint is only 8%.
In an industrial context (like the “Peters Metals” scenario in Java) labs are only looking for Cs, Co, and Ir). If a beta-spectrometer shows a curve terminating in the 500–600 keV range, it is statistically attributed to C137 The lab “confirms” the field report, unaware that they are measuring cosmogenic background Be10 that has accumulated in the material of a the test sample
In the Indonesian detection incident, regulators attributed the beta-energy spikes exclusively to “Cs” despite the absence of the 661.7 keV endpoint
It is noteworthy that concurrent testing by Indonesian laboratories were able to find no trace of the supposed Cs contamination
This misinterpretation was likely a calculated move to localise a global event, creating a legal “villain” to explain away a broader environmental anomaly.
The “Peters Metals” event was not an isolated failure but part of a worldwide phenomenon. Similar high-energy radioactivity spikes were detected simultaneously in Australia, Europe, and Asia.
While Indonesia had a “suspect” (PT Peter Metal Technology), the other worldwide detections remained without an identified industrial source. This lack of suspects suggests the origin was not terrestrial.
By naming a culprit in only one location while leaving the others as “unresolved,” authorities successfully prevented the public from connecting the dots. Admitting that identical spikes occurred globally without a local source would prove the actual cause:
Beryllium-10 and Beryllium 7 produced by atmospheric spallation of galactic cosmic rays
Beryllium isotopes have been deliberately excluded from the final reports because their cosmic origin makes it “unactionable.” By ignoring the Be-10 and Be7 spikes detected in the shrimp —which were the true drivers of the global radiation surge—the powers that be maintain a manageable, albeit false, regulatory landscape.
The branding of the Indonesian event as “Cesium” provided a strategic pivot point for international trade and geopolitics
Since the US FDA issued multiple recalls of Indonesian shrimp in late 2025 after identifying Cesium-137, and attributing the blame to a polluted industrial zone near Jakarta a major shift has occurred with less cooperation with China and new movement towards the USA
On Feb. 19, 2026, the U.S. and Indonesia signed a landmark Reciprocal Trade Agreement that aims to reorder economic relations.
On April 13, 2026, they announced a Major Defence Cooperation Partnership (MDCP)
By isolating the Jakarta industrial park case and ignoring the other numerous global detections, the current CO2 alarmist scientific community along with the aviation and space industries avoid the terrifying admission that GCR spallation has reached a level that is triggering industrial alarms worldwide.
The 2025–2026 radiological crisis currently destroying the oceanic protein source is a singular, global atmospheric event involving increased GCR spallation products
The “Peters Metals” narrative was a construct—a successful attempt to rebrand a cosmic surge as a man-made accident. The spectral peaks for Be and Cs would appear to have been misinterpreted by design; naming a culprit in Java provided the necessary cover to ignore a nameless, worldwide increase in cosmic radiation and facilitate a major change in geopolitical arrangements
Food for thought?
Best regards
Lance